Fees stated in advance
On request, before rather than after.
Continuity of care is a legal duty in Belgium, not a courtesy. A doctor who is away must arrange a qualified colleague and make the record reachable, so nobody picks up your care blind. That is in place from the first week, not the first year.
This page describes what the practice does. It is not advice, and it is not an encouragement to seek any examination or treatment.
General medical activities, carried on under the applicable professional regulation.
See the programWhat happens to your care when this practice is not available.
See the programA patient record kept as the law requires, and accessible to you.
See the programWhat a practice registered in 2026 can and cannot claim.
See the programArrange cover before it is needed and make the record reachable to whoever provides it, write the record as something that will be read in decades rather than weeks, state fees before an appointment, and refer where a matter falls outside competence.
On request, before rather than after.
Purpose, nature, risks, alternatives and cost.
Qualified, with the record reachable.
Rather than proceeding regardless.
Fees are in euro and are those applicable to the practice. They are stated in advance on request, before an appointment rather than after it.
The applicable fee, told to you beforehand.
What happens when this practice is unavailable.
Absent on purpose, not by oversight.
Every engagement is quoted after a free consultation. No subscription.
STIJN MICHIELS ARTS BV was created on 16 September 2026 and is registered with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises under number 1042.565.797, with its registered office at 32 Hulshout in Brasschaat, province of Antwerp. The registered activity is general medical practice.
The company is a matter of weeks old and there is no sense in dressing that up. What a new practice can be judged on is not accumulated reputation but whether the things that must be in place actually are, and two of those are worth setting out. The first is continuity of care, which Belgian law treats as an obligation rather than a courtesy. A practitioner must ensure that the care they provide continues in their absence, which means arranging for a colleague holding the required competence to take over and making the patient record accessible to them, so that nobody resumes a patient's care without knowing what has happened so far. Participation in organised on-call arrangements belongs to the same duty. The second is the record itself. It has to be retained for at least thirty years after the last contact and may be kept for up to fifty, so a note written at a first consultation may well be read by someone long after everyone involved has forgotten the appointment. That is the argument for writing it properly from the first week rather than from the point at which a practice feels established. Beyond those, a practitioner acts only within their competence and refers beyond it, and patient rights apply in full from day one.
That is a fair question and the honest answer is that the company was registered in September 2026, so there is no track record to point at. What there is instead are the things that are either in place or are not: continuity arrangements for when the practice is unavailable, a patient record kept as the law requires, fees stated before an appointment rather than after, and a willingness to refer rather than to proceed beyond competence. Those are checkable now rather than in five years.
Care is taken over by a colleague holding the required competence, and your record is made accessible to them. That is not a courtesy arrangement, it is what the legislation on the quality of healthcare practice requires: a practitioner must ensure the continuity of the care they provide, and must make the record reachable so that whoever covers is not working without the necessary information. Participation in organised on-call arrangements is part of the same obligation.
At least thirty years after the last contact, and it may be kept for up to fifty. It will outlive the episode of care that created it by a very long way, which is the main reason a record is worth writing carefully at the time rather than reconstructing later. You have a right of access to it and a right to obtain a copy, and those are rights rather than favours to be requested politely.
Then you will be told and referred. A practitioner may act only within the limits of their competence and experience and must refer where a matter falls outside them, which is a legal requirement rather than a matter of style. Being referred is not being turned away, and a practice that treats a referral as a failure is a practice that will eventually proceed when it should not.
Because the rules on what a doctor may say publicly exclude comparisons with other practitioners, claims of superiority, patient testimonials, success rates and any promise about an outcome. A page containing those things would be both prohibited and, in the way an advertisement needs them, untrue. What belongs on a page like this is practical information about how the practice operates, which is why continuity and the record occupy the space.
Yes, and you should. Fees applicable to a consultation are stated in advance on request, and the practice's position in relation to the national agreement between physicians and the sickness funds is on the legal page. That status determines whether supplements may be charged above the agreed tariff, and knowing it beforehand removes the only genuinely unpleasant surprise in ordinary primary care.
Fees are stated in advance on request. In an emergency, contact the emergency services.